MEARB Simple Score Sheet — RA 12009
Bidder 1
Bidder 2
Bidder 3
Bidder 4
MEARB Evaluation Score Sheet
Most Economically Advantageous Responsive Bid — RA 12009, Sec. 49
RA 12009 · NGPA
Set Technical Weight:
Criteria evaluated under this area:
Compliance with Technical Specifications
Quality / Grade of Materials or Products
Completeness of Technical Documents Submitted
Approach and Methodology (if applicable)
Delivery Period / Implementation Schedule
Criteria evaluated under this area:
Track Record & Similar Projects Completed
Financial Capacity & Net Worth
Key Personnel: Qualifications & Experience
Tools, Equipment & Facilities Available
Organizational Structure & Staffing Plan
Criteria evaluated under this area:
Warranty Period & Coverage
After-Sales Service & Technical Assistance
QA / QC System & ISO / Certifications
Availability of Spare Parts / Support Infrastructure
Sustainability / Life-Cycle Cost Considerations
Criteria evaluated under this area:
Risk Mitigation Plan
Compliance with Labor / Safety Standards
Environmental Compliance (Green / Sustainable)
Preference for Local / MSME / GOCC Bidder (if applicable)
Innovation / Value-Added Features
TECHNICAL COMPONENT TOTAL (A.1 + A.2 + A.3 + A.4)
Raw Score:
—
/100
Weighted Score:
—
B.1 Financial Score Computation
✦ The lowest responsive bid automatically receives a Financial Score of 100. Higher bids receive proportionally lower scores.
Technical Weighted Score
—
out of 40.00 possible points
Financial Weighted Score
—
out of 60.00 possible points
MEARB Combined Score (Technical + Financial)
—
/ 100.00
Rank Recommendation
NOT YET SCORED
BAC Member Notes / Observations
BAC Member 1
Signature over Printed Name / Date
BAC Member 2
Signature over Printed Name / Date
BAC Member 3 / Chairperson
Signature over Printed Name / Date